<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mark Wagner - Yet Another Blog</title>
	<link>http://www.decimation.com/markw</link>
	<description>Because a lot happens on this pale blue dot</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 02:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on DD-WRT vs. Tomato: Winner is Tomato by Name</title>
		<link>http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/10/02/dd-wrt-vs-tomato-winner-is-tomato/#comment-4493</link>
		<author>Name</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 07:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/10/02/dd-wrt-vs-tomato-winner-is-tomato/#comment-4493</guid>
		<description>LOL

Script kiddies, you cant use ddwrt and thats why you have a piece of shit router, is it faster? possible, but a few nice graphics cant defend your system or give  you shuch flexibility like ddwrt ... learn to use linux, and forget the webgui. Your tomato is a hill of shit, stable? yes, like the new ddwrt ... they keep the source, ok, but who cares? you can delete the iptables  entries point to  ips that ddwrt  left for you  as a suprise ... but if you dont know how to use ssh or telnet ... sorry :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL</p>
<p>Script kiddies, you cant use ddwrt and thats why you have a piece of shit router, is it faster? possible, but a few nice graphics cant defend your system or give  you shuch flexibility like ddwrt &#8230; learn to use linux, and forget the webgui. Your tomato is a hill of shit, stable? yes, like the new ddwrt &#8230; they keep the source, ok, but who cares? you can delete the iptables  entries point to  ips that ddwrt  left for you  as a suprise &#8230; but if you dont know how to use ssh or telnet &#8230; sorry <img src='http://www.decimation.com/markw/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DD-WRT vs. Tomato: Winner is Tomato by Ron C</title>
		<link>http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/10/02/dd-wrt-vs-tomato-winner-is-tomato/#comment-4471</link>
		<author>Ron C</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/10/02/dd-wrt-vs-tomato-winner-is-tomato/#comment-4471</guid>
		<description>Tomato firmware is up to version 1.28.

I highly recommend checking it out, if your router is supported, that's the only way to make an informed decision about what's best for you.

I've used both, and my routers at home are all running Tomato without a single problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomato firmware is up to version 1.28.</p>
<p>I highly recommend checking it out, if your router is supported, that&#8217;s the only way to make an informed decision about what&#8217;s best for you.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used both, and my routers at home are all running Tomato without a single problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DD-WRT vs. Tomato: Winner is Tomato by jharel</title>
		<link>http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/10/02/dd-wrt-vs-tomato-winner-is-tomato/#comment-4437</link>
		<author>jharel</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 16:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/10/02/dd-wrt-vs-tomato-winner-is-tomato/#comment-4437</guid>
		<description>I agree that Tomato is rock solid.

If I want to know when was the last time there was a power outage at my house, I just check the uptime....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Tomato is rock solid.</p>
<p>If I want to know when was the last time there was a power outage at my house, I just check the uptime&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DD-WRT vs. Tomato: Winner is Tomato by Leah Perez</title>
		<link>http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/10/02/dd-wrt-vs-tomato-winner-is-tomato/#comment-4415</link>
		<author>Leah Perez</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 05:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/10/02/dd-wrt-vs-tomato-winner-is-tomato/#comment-4415</guid>
		<description>online movies are cool but i wish the quality were better.`:.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>online movies are cool but i wish the quality were better.`:.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tomato QoS Setup by Tomato para tu router (si te dejan) &#124; Geekotic</title>
		<link>http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/10/03/tomato-qos-setup/#comment-4397</link>
		<author>Tomato para tu router (si te dejan) &#124; Geekotic</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 08:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/10/03/tomato-qos-setup/#comment-4397</guid>
		<description>[...] Tomato QoS Setup [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Tomato QoS Setup [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DD-WRT vs. Tomato: Winner is Tomato by Vasopro</title>
		<link>http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/10/02/dd-wrt-vs-tomato-winner-is-tomato/#comment-4395</link>
		<author>Vasopro</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 03:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/10/02/dd-wrt-vs-tomato-winner-is-tomato/#comment-4395</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comparison.

I'm going to pickup a router with Tomato pre-installed on eBay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comparison.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to pickup a router with Tomato pre-installed on eBay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DD-WRT vs. Tomato: Winner is Tomato by Tomato on Asus RT-N16 router</title>
		<link>http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/10/02/dd-wrt-vs-tomato-winner-is-tomato/#comment-4369</link>
		<author>Tomato on Asus RT-N16 router</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 20:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/10/02/dd-wrt-vs-tomato-winner-is-tomato/#comment-4369</guid>
		<description>[...] derserves its own post). I&#8217;ve been hearing this thing called tomato that is supposedly even better than DD-WRT. Been wanting to try it, especially since it is supposed to work well on the Asus [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] derserves its own post). I&#8217;ve been hearing this thing called tomato that is supposedly even better than DD-WRT. Been wanting to try it, especially since it is supposed to work well on the Asus [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DD-WRT vs. Tomato: Winner is Tomato by Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/10/02/dd-wrt-vs-tomato-winner-is-tomato/#comment-4358</link>
		<author>Steve</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 21:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/10/02/dd-wrt-vs-tomato-winner-is-tomato/#comment-4358</guid>
		<description>I have used tomato for years...and I cannot understate how rock solid it is.  Routers stay up for months on end...until the power fails.

Other advantages, access restriction far better than standard linksys.  I can't comment on DD-WRT's.  UI is very straightforward, which I hear is not the case for DD-WRT.  Device flexibility is another fantastic feature for tomato.  The same router (in my case, a WRT54GL) can be used as a router, AP, router/AP, ethernet bridge, or even in a wireless mesh configuration using WDS.

Why might one consider another firmware?

1) Tomato is limited in the routers it supports...with no N support as far as I know

2) Development seemed to stop last year...with several branches proceeding by other devs...precariously

3) no IPv6 support

4) Other firmwares have far more available features...especially for business use.


That said, Tomato runs on the three WRT-54GLs in my house - configured as a router, an AP, and a bridge respectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used tomato for years&#8230;and I cannot understate how rock solid it is.  Routers stay up for months on end&#8230;until the power fails.</p>
<p>Other advantages, access restriction far better than standard linksys.  I can&#8217;t comment on DD-WRT&#8217;s.  UI is very straightforward, which I hear is not the case for DD-WRT.  Device flexibility is another fantastic feature for tomato.  The same router (in my case, a WRT54GL) can be used as a router, AP, router/AP, ethernet bridge, or even in a wireless mesh configuration using WDS.</p>
<p>Why might one consider another firmware?</p>
<p>1) Tomato is limited in the routers it supports&#8230;with no N support as far as I know</p>
<p>2) Development seemed to stop last year&#8230;with several branches proceeding by other devs&#8230;precariously</p>
<p>3) no IPv6 support</p>
<p>4) Other firmwares have far more available features&#8230;especially for business use.</p>
<p>That said, Tomato runs on the three WRT-54GLs in my house - configured as a router, an AP, and a bridge respectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DD-WRT vs. Tomato: Winner is Tomato by redrum</title>
		<link>http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/10/02/dd-wrt-vs-tomato-winner-is-tomato/#comment-4295</link>
		<author>redrum</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 01:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/10/02/dd-wrt-vs-tomato-winner-is-tomato/#comment-4295</guid>
		<description>I was using ddwrt for years (since my first wrt54). In fact I bought 2 Buffalo's  WHR-HP-G54 from them with the vpn-special build to have enough memory headroom. So I really like and support (brainslayer is a genius by the way). I tried Tomato on one of them because I had issues with the Wifi and indeed it's a faster/lighter firmware. It's only a fraction of ddwrt in features, but for a home setup seems more than enough. I hate to say this but tomato is more stable than ddwrt. So my main router connected to dsl modem is working with tomato and I can do all the kinky stuff with my other ddwrt router. But if I had to choose only one firmware , I would choose tomato. It's mot about the ui and all that. It's about QoS with minimum fuss and monitoring and no need for reboot (uptime 167days). I'm not promoting any firmware here. Just sharing an experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was using ddwrt for years (since my first wrt54). In fact I bought 2 Buffalo&#8217;s  WHR-HP-G54 from them with the vpn-special build to have enough memory headroom. So I really like and support (brainslayer is a genius by the way). I tried Tomato on one of them because I had issues with the Wifi and indeed it&#8217;s a faster/lighter firmware. It&#8217;s only a fraction of ddwrt in features, but for a home setup seems more than enough. I hate to say this but tomato is more stable than ddwrt. So my main router connected to dsl modem is working with tomato and I can do all the kinky stuff with my other ddwrt router. But if I had to choose only one firmware , I would choose tomato. It&#8217;s mot about the ui and all that. It&#8217;s about QoS with minimum fuss and monitoring and no need for reboot (uptime 167days). I&#8217;m not promoting any firmware here. Just sharing an experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uTorrent: Blocking IP Addresses by Scream 4 The Movie</title>
		<link>http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/08/30/utorrent-blocking-ip-addresses/#comment-4286</link>
		<author>Scream 4 The Movie</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 00:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/08/30/utorrent-blocking-ip-addresses/#comment-4286</guid>
		<description>Your blog has helped, thanks a lot. I've found it once or twice now and will quite possibly bookmark it. You actually may would like to update wordpress as there exists a new release obtainable at this moment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your blog has helped, thanks a lot. I&#8217;ve found it once or twice now and will quite possibly bookmark it. You actually may would like to update wordpress as there exists a new release obtainable at this moment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
