I don’t know what creationist you have heard, but creationist never start off saying something like this. Creationism is a theory too. The question is which theory is sound, and which theory is based on lies.

If you really have studied the science behind evolution (as you claim), then you wouldn’t be an evolutionist.

Evolution is the greatest scientific lie of all times.

Creationist believe in adaptation. Macro-evolution (One Kind changing into another Kind) is completely different then Micro-evolution which is adaptation. Christians shouldn’t believe in evolution (Macro-evolution) for two reasons. One, it is scientifically wrong (see my blog), and two, the Bible says that the earth was created in 6 days and the Bible has always turned out to be correct.

We had some heated debate…well…arguements. Her position: “I believe that there can be and has been considerable adaptation within various species but not that one species can morph into another.” That intrigued me quite a bit because I had never even considered that possibility…it seemed ridiculous, but once she started supporting the statement with evidence I of course had to start studying to get some ammunition to fire back.

During that study/ongoing debate/heated arguement I came to realize that she was 100% correct and finally, reluctantly, reversed my position. We’ve been divorced over four years now but I have little choice but to conclude the same: I believe that there can be and has been adaptation within species but not that one species can morph into another.

I realize these guys who’s lives depend on their computer turning on every morning so they can pursue “knowledge” nearly 24-7 and worship at the alter of Einstein are not likely to admit to having been mislead, but if you are where I was: simply assuming evolution occurred due to never really questioning it, take a deeper look at it. I’m betting you’ll conclude otherwise. Maybe not. But don’t necessarily accept everything you were taught or everything scientists and/or geek-wanna-be scientists claim is “proven” (so don’t you go looking for flaws now) at face value. Or worse, let the evolutionists bully you with words, using tactics such as claiming or insinuating that those who question and disagree with so-called “facts beyong dispute” lack intelligence; that somehow this Theory is beyond a theory and beyond debate.

There are serious gaps and fatal flaws in The Theory of Evolution, no doubt about it. Sorry, but I can no longer buy it.

why can’t we so called intelligent humans reproduce what unintelligent nature has done? we can’t create life from non life. we can’t design anything as complicated as the simple cell. does that mean we are not really intelligent? because either we are not or nature is.

neither evolution or creation can be proved, both are beliefs. creation makes more sense to me.

People seem to miss that since life is all chemistry, the biggest challenge of researchers in abiogenesis is figuring out what the conditions were that made life possible. Once we bring things together under the right conditions, chemistry takes over and makes abiogenesis inevitable.