Comments on: Richard Dawkins: Halibut Evolution http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/08/22/richard-dawkins-halibut-evolution/ Because a lot happens on this pale blue dot Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:04:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: martin http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/08/22/richard-dawkins-halibut-evolution/#comment-2409 martin Mon, 26 May 2008 14:10:55 +0000 http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/08/22/richard-dawkins-halibut-evolution/#comment-2409 picktj - another retard desided to spam the internet. yes, evolution ONLY makes species that doesn't change during their lifcycle... it's in the evolution bib.. oh shit, evolution doesn't have a bible. EVOLUTION means ANY change that fits/is good enough will prevail. take the damn tadpoles. the cycle of a frog is not perfect but it is successful enough in this environment so it remains. if u change the environment frogs might remain but they might disappear. the faster u change the environment the lower is the percentage of possibility of the species remaining. i guess thats too complex, but anyway... homo sapiens changes the world, we hve destoried 1/3 worlds frog species so far. gods plan? sure, 'coz god just hates them froggies. there r MILLIONS of species like this. damn - we r in womb with hairy body and tail and we lose them before we emerge. y? coz we don't use them but they r also not in the way in the womb. this is pointless... one thing that is genetically/evolutionaly favored is singlemindedness and stubborness (because it makes us stick with something and statistically it's the right thing to do) and religious people are the perversion of that... picktj - another retard desided to spam the internet. yes, evolution ONLY makes species that doesn’t change during their lifcycle… it’s in the evolution bib.. oh shit, evolution doesn’t have a bible. EVOLUTION means ANY change that fits/is good enough will prevail. take the damn tadpoles. the cycle of a frog is not perfect but it is successful enough in this environment so it remains. if u change the environment frogs might remain but they might disappear. the faster u change the environment the lower is the percentage of possibility of the species remaining. i guess thats too complex, but anyway… homo sapiens changes the world, we hve destoried 1/3 worlds frog species so far. gods plan? sure, ‘coz god just hates them froggies. there r MILLIONS of species like this. damn - we r in womb with hairy body and tail and we lose them before we emerge. y? coz we don’t use them but they r also not in the way in the womb. this is pointless… one thing that is genetically/evolutionaly favored is singlemindedness and stubborness (because it makes us stick with something and statistically it’s the right thing to do) and religious people are the perversion of that…

]]> By: sda http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/08/22/richard-dawkins-halibut-evolution/#comment-1603 sda Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:52:12 +0000 http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/08/22/richard-dawkins-halibut-evolution/#comment-1603 rock on thats the truth !! evolution live , damn religions rock on thats the truth !! evolution live , damn religions

]]> By: Michael R http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/08/22/richard-dawkins-halibut-evolution/#comment-581 Michael R Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:44:05 +0000 http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/08/22/richard-dawkins-halibut-evolution/#comment-581 That is an interesting point you make TJ. That is an interesting point you make TJ.

]]> By: picktj http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/08/22/richard-dawkins-halibut-evolution/#comment-552 picktj Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:32:03 +0000 http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/08/22/richard-dawkins-halibut-evolution/#comment-552 The flat fish will under go the process in its lifetime. This is not the type of evolution you would expect if it had evolved.It changes to meet certain conditions but uses the same dna not new dna.This shows a plan resembling intelligence.It happens fast and as a result refutes or makes mute evolution. If one creature evolves while it is still alive, it no longer needs the millions of years to change, making it successful. Slow change would make it volunerable to other forces that change faster.In millions of years the earth would change drastically.When I was young I saw the halibut, but, reasoned my way thru it. Evolution is not reasonable. The flat fish will under go the process in its lifetime. This is not the type of evolution you would expect if it had evolved.It changes to meet certain conditions but uses the same dna not new dna.This shows a plan resembling intelligence.It happens fast and as a result refutes or makes mute evolution. If one creature evolves while it is still alive, it no longer needs the millions of years to change, making it successful. Slow change would make it volunerable to other forces that change faster.In millions of years the earth would change drastically.When I was young I saw the halibut, but, reasoned my way thru it. Evolution is not reasonable.

]]> By: Michael R http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/08/22/richard-dawkins-halibut-evolution/#comment-499 Michael R Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:40:07 +0000 http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/08/22/richard-dawkins-halibut-evolution/#comment-499 It's a vicious paradox indeed! It’s a vicious paradox indeed!

]]> By: Mark http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/08/22/richard-dawkins-halibut-evolution/#comment-469 Mark Thu, 06 Sep 2007 19:31:12 +0000 http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/08/22/richard-dawkins-halibut-evolution/#comment-469 Or perhaps the halibut evolved to give the illusion that it was created via "intelligent design" :wink: Or perhaps the halibut evolved to give the illusion that it was created via “intelligent design” :wink:

]]> By: Michael R http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/08/22/richard-dawkins-halibut-evolution/#comment-467 Michael R Thu, 06 Sep 2007 18:47:47 +0000 http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/08/22/richard-dawkins-halibut-evolution/#comment-467 The hard part here is the fact that for some reason evolution and creationism need to be exclusive of one another... Perhaps the halibut was created to evolve? The hard part here is the fact that for some reason evolution and creationism need to be exclusive of one another…

Perhaps the halibut was created to evolve?

]]>